It was to be filed on Thursday noon and then this afternoon. It will eventually be sent Friday morning July 17 “because it is very long to write,” says Mr. Jerome Triomphe, one of Vincent Lambert parents lawyers. Umpteenth episode of the legal battle that is tearing the Lambert family, the criminal complaint against the CHU Reims assassination attempt aimed at “collegiate recovery impact on stopping treatment decided on Wednesday,” said the lawyer.
Fiercely opposed to euthanasia of their son, despite court decisions of the Council of State and the ECHR that make legally possible to stop treatment, Vincent Lambert’s parents would not let up.
From the time the doctor is attacked, indicted for attempted murder, how can he decide to kill Vincent Lambert? “asks Mr. Jerome Triomphe,
also counsel Catholic Civitas Institute or some members of the Manif for all.
The reasons for the complaint against the medical team? “Attempted assassination, violence, and false forgery, breach of medical confidentiality, undermine the freedom and arbitrary sequestration. “Pressures that echo those received in the past by the first doctor in charge of Vincent Lambert, Dr. Kariger, who eventually crack and go the torch last September, considering after several death threats that “it was going too far.”
“The only consequence? Extend the relentlessness “
With the complaint, it was Dr. Simon who is this time more specifically targeted.” It is scandalous conflict with Vincent Lambert’s wife she is an official support ” , asserts Mr. Jerome Triomphe. His clients gave 24 hours to the medical team to decide on the transfer of their son to another facility, failing to file a complaint. “We have no answer since June 1, when we have three institutions that agree to host Vincent Lambert, and we are in relation to the other three. “
The announcement of this complaint was met with weariness by the rest of the family.” It may impress the CHU “sighs the nephew of Vincent Lambert, François.” Contrary to what parents, Dr. Simon was not the counselor Rachel before the ECHR, this is still a clerical error of the Court, for which it was requested rectification there some time, “he corrects. The complaint seeks the CHU as a corporation and several doctors.
Before Dr. Simon, Dr. Kariger was harassed, intimidated, threatened with death. It worked, he eventually withdraw from the case … “
A scenario they fear a repeat again, to the detriment of the patient. For François Lambert observes,” the only consequence it has is to extend the fury that Vincent suffered. “
Charlotte Cieslinski
No comments:
Post a Comment