What should be the role of IT giants face to the use of their tools by terrorists? Should we allow the installation of back doors to facilitate the work of investigators and justice at the risk of imposing a widespread surveillance? The debate rages.
Following the series of attacks that struck Paris particularly, the US authorities have been pressure to impose again these stolen access. But for Apple, the answer is always the same. This is not
When asked by CBS as part of the 60 Minutes Tim Cook, Apple boss confirms that the US administration has although repeated these requests. But for the p-d give the keys to the authorities, but also give the keys to the “bad guys”.
“There was no compromise
possible between privacy and national security. This is a point of view
too simplistic. We are in America. We should have one and
the other, “said Tim Cook.” If the government presents the proper mandate, we will provide specific information. Because the law requires us to do. But it does not cover the encrypted communications and we do not have to provide this information, “he said.
This firm response is in the line of the call by a group bringing together the leaders American industry
IT declaring his opposition to the establishment backdoor on technology products for data access
encrypted.
Weaken
data encryption technology to help governments
in their electronic communications monitoring mission
name of national security “simply makes no sense”
says the Information Technology Industry Council
in a statement. “After a horrible tragedy like the attacks
of Paris, we naturally look for solutions: the weakening
Encryption is not a solution, “said Dean Garfield,
president of the Washington-based organization, representing between
Another Apple, Google, and Microsoft.
As Cook, defenders of privacy, and IT companies
Security researchers emphasize that backdoors
expose users’ data to hackers. ” The
Encryption is a security tool we rely on all
days to prevent criminals to empty our bank accounts, and
protect our cars and planes to be subject to hacks, “explains
Dean Garfield.
Recall that Francois Molins, the Paris prosecutor in charge of the investigation into the attacks were co-signed an article published on August 11 in the New York Times, entitled ‘When phone encryption blocks Justice’ (‘When encryption telephones blocks Justice ‘), denouncing the techniques of Apple and Google designed to fully encrypt user data of Andoid and iOS devices. The text advocated an alteration of these safeguards for privacy.
“Encryption Full Disk limit considerably our ability to investigate (…) and undermines serious our efficiency the fight against terrorism . Why should we help criminal activities prosper on a medium that escapes the implementation of law? E nquêter these cases not smartphone data returns to work with one hand tied behind back “says the platform.
No comments:
Post a Comment