WHO has classified Monday, red meat transformed into the “carcinogenic” products. The cancer experts Yet sometimes speak of “carcinogenic” substances. Are there a difference?
Carcinogen, red meat probably is red and processed meat certainly is, according to Classification of the World Health Organization announced Monday. In other words, an important and regular consumption of this meat can promote the development of cancer. But do not we say sometimes other products increase the risk of the disease they cause cancer
The dictionary Larousse can not really see clearer: it offers “carcinogen or carcinogenic “, establishing the two words as perfectly synonymous. The National Cancer Institute (INCA), meanwhile, uses the two interchangeably, as the League against cancer. The only difference in his dictionary, INCa offers only the term carcinogen
So, would it be an end to privilege.? “There is really no difference, it’s the same thing”, assured in 2013 INCa to MetroNews . The variant of the two terms would be linked only to the vagaries of the French language. On their blog, correcting the daily Le Monde indeed explain this difference by the simple usage habits. The term carcinogen was apparently first used before carcinogen appears in everyday language, without replacing the first. This situation exists with other French words such as Seismic and Seismic .
Still, according to the site Speaking French, the word carcinogen would ultimately preferred to carcinogen with the Bescherelle, for the sake of linguistic consistency. We talk effect of cancer and cancer specialists. The term is also derived from the Greek, which usually involves the use of “o” where the Latin words derived receive the “i”.
In short, carcinogen and carcinogen seem to be white and half a dozen. A slight semantic distinction is made, according to MetroNews by some specialists: carcinogen would be a unique feature which promotes the development of cancer, while carcinogens would effectively promote the development of an already declared cancer. A shade that ultimately does not change the WHO classification.
No comments:
Post a Comment